THE QUESTION
Where to place which reactor?
Different hardware creates different siting answers. Cooling, footprint, logistics, and grid needs change the shape of a viable site.
Site intelligence for nuclear builds
Make the first cut visible.
Nuclearer helps reactor vendors and developers answer the expensive question early: where should this reactor go?
01 / The vision
Turn a months-long siting question into a visible decision.
Why it was built: a map is not enough, and a shortlist is not enough. The useful product is the reasoning between the two.
THE PRODUCT
A cited first cut
Explore a region, choose a reactor, and see the fatal constraints before field-study money is committed.
THE STANDARD
Useful without pretending
This is screen-level intelligence. It is not a permit decision or a substitute for engineering, legal, or regulatory work.
The core idea: make uncertainty legible so the next decision is better.
02 / Try the screening loop
Pick a place. Pick a machine.
This small, self-contained demo shows the product logic. Change either input and the screening posture changes with it.
● LIVE DEMO
WYOMING / USA
Kemmerer corridor
BWRX-300 · coal repower
Screen-worthy
Grid82
Cooling68
Permits61
Logistics76
Repower context improves grid and industrial logistics. Verify water rights, transmission upgrades, and community pathway next.
03 / What the build taught us
Good product ideas became better when the evidence had to survive contact with the interface.
Credibility is a feature
Citations, confidence levels, and explicit next studies belong beside the answer. They cannot be buried in a methodology page.
Hardware changes the story
A reactor picker is not decoration. It turns “find a site” into the more useful comparison: “fit this machine to this place.”
Curate the demo path
Vetted analyses make a presentation deterministic. Live reasoning can remain the fallback for exploration without making the main story fragile.
Show fatal flaws early
A statutory ban should stop the journey clearly. A confident-looking shortlist that hides a hard constraint is worse than no answer.
Make the next step concrete
“Needs more research” is not useful. Name the study: water rights, grid queue, hazards, entitlement, or emergency planning.
Visuals carry the argument
The globe, friction bars, verdicts, and future footprint rings make an abstract screening process discussable in a room.
“Same region. Completely different siting answer. That is the decision Nuclearer makes visual.”
From the demo narrative · eVinci versus a large water-cooled build